Mr A Ikeji v Mr P Jones and MTR (Crossrail) Ltd: 2208063/2017

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2208063/2017
Mr A IkejiClaimant1. Mr P Jones 2. MTR (Crossrail) LtdRespondent
Employment Judge WadeDate 17 September 2016

JUDGMENT

The claimant’s application dated 3 September 2018 for reconsideration of the judgment sent to the parties on 20 August 2018 is refused.

REASONS

There is no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked, because:[1]The points the claimant makes relate to matters appropriate to an appeal.[2]The decision was unanimous after careful examination of all the evidence.[3]There is no new evidence which would affect the Tribunal’s conclusions and the claimant has misread the findings at paragraphs 10, 15, 16, 17 and 21 and still appears to believe that “a respondent” can be liable for discrimination even though no individual perpetrator has been identified.[4]The claimant had the opportunity to provide information about his means before the costs order was made but was not helpful.[5]The Tribunal was aware that the claimant was a litigant in person but as an educated man and experienced litigator he was in a position to make sound judgments about his prospects of success.