Ms P Kunjuraman v Zaha Hadid Limited and another: 2207089/2018
JUDGMENT
[1]Disclosures 1, 2, 8, 9, 10 (regarding Iran), 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 relied on by the Claimant are not qualifying disclosures within the meaning of section 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 by reason of the operation of section 43B(4). The Claimant is not able to rely on these disclosures for the purposes of her complaints of detriment and unfair dismissal by reason of protected disclosures.[2]Disclosures 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10 (regarding Russia), 11, 17, 18, 19 and 20 do not fall within section 43B(4) of the Employment Rights Act. The Claimant is not prevented from relying on these for the purposes of her said complaints of detriment and unfair dismissal by reason of that section or by reason of any asserted legal professional privilege.[3]With the agreement of the parties, written reasons for this judgment will be sent subsequently. Case Number: 2207089/2018