Miss E Plumley v Lenslife Technologies Ltd: 2206223/2020
JUDGMENT
[1]This was a remote final hearing in this case of a claim for wages due where the Respondent had not entered a Notice of Appearance. All parties confirmed they could hear and be heard and see and be seen in the CVP process.[2]When this claim was called on for hearing the parties notified that compromise had been achieved in principle and time was sought for a settlement to be concluded with the assistance of ACAS.[3]After a period the parties reported that the settlement had been concluded and ACAS had confirmed a legally binding agreement.[4]The Claimant informed the tribunal that by the settlement she withdrew her claim. She further indicated she would accepted that the Claim would be dismissed.[5]The Claim having been withdrawn, Rule 52 provides that the Tribunal shall issue a judgment dismissing it, unless the circumstances identified apply.[6]Since the circumstances identified in Rule 52 do not apply the Claim is dismissed.