Ms L Hutchison v Shiseido Group Ltd: 2206136/2018

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2206136/2018
Ms L HutchisonClaimantShiseido Group LimitedRespondent
Employment Judge ShepherdMr Owen for claimantMr Webster for respondentDate 29 April 2019

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claimant presented a claim to the Employment Tribunal of unfair dismissal and pregnancy or maternity discrimination.[2]Notice of the claim was sent to the respondent on 25 January 2019. No response has been presented by the respondent.[3]This claim succeeds and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing.

REASONS

The time for presenting a response has expired and no valid response has been presented, and, on the information before the employment judge, the claim succeeds. Employment Judge Shepherd _____________________________ Date: 27 February 2019 Case Number: 2206136/2018 1 of 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms L Hutchison Respondent: Shiseido Group Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard at: North Shields On: 29 April 2019 Before: Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances For the claimant: Mr Owen For the respondent: Mr Webster JUDGMENT[1]Upon reconsideration the judgment pursuant to rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 dated 27 February 2019 is revoked.[2]The respondent is granted an extension of time to file its response which is now accepted.[3]The claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed upon withdrawal.