Ms A Gabele Mandelou v Dyvrande Ltd: 2205887/2018
JUDGMENT
The claim is dismissed.REASONS
[1]This is the third hearing. On 31 January EJ Stewart ascertained that if tax and national insurance owed to HMRC was paid, the Claimant would withdraw her claim. His Orders provided for payment to HMRC and then the Respondent satisfying the Claimant that this had been done. On 28 February EJ Stewart made another Order to similar effect. This included the Respondent satisfying the Claimant about payment “through her representative, Mr N T Turco.” He envisaged the Claimant withdrawing the claim and this hearing being vacated.[2]The Claimant is not so satisfied. She has not attended today but has written to say she wants to continue her claim. However, the Respondent says it has paid £2,184.24 to HMRC, produced a screen shot to this effect and the director has given evidence on oath that the payment has been made. Further, Mr Clarke tells me that he could not contact Mr Turco as he has no details. Case Number: 2205887/2018[3]I accept the evidence. The litigation cannot go on endlessly. The deductions from wages now having been paid to HMRC, I dismiss the claim.