Mr I Mohammed v Rendall and Rittner Ltd: 2205774/2020

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2205774/2020
Mr I MohammedClaimantRendall and Rittner LimitedRespondent
Employment Judge AdkinMs F Almazedi (instructed by Solicitor) for claimantMs B Omotosho (instructed by Solicitor) for respondentMs B Omatosho (instructed by solicitor) for respondentDate 17 September 2021

JUDGMENT

(1) The following claims are dismissed:a. The claim of direct race discrimination brought under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 (“EqA”) is brought out of time. It is not just and equitable to extend time.b. The claim of harassment relating to race brought under section 26 of EqA is brought out of time. It is not just and equitable to extend time.c. The claim of protected disclosure detriment brought under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA”) is brought out of time. There will be no extension under the provisions of section 48(3) ERA.(2) The application to strike out or make deposit orders in respect of the following claims are refused, and these will proceed to a five day final hearing already listed on Monday 13 September 2021: a. Claim of unfair dismissal under section 98 ERA. b. Claim of automatic unfair dismissal under section 103(A) ERA. Case Number: 2205774/2020 V/CVP PHCM Order (NEW August 2020) 2 of 2 August 2020 c. Claim of victimisation under section 27 ERA, including claim that the dismissal was an act of victimisation. Victimisation dismissal[1]For reasons given orally, I clarified that the Grounds of Complaint (particularly paragraph 1) contained in allegation that the dismissal was an act of victimisation, and in the alternative if I was wrong about this I would have readily allowed an application to make this clear by adding the words “including his dismissal,” after the word “treatment” in paragraph 1. Wasted Costs[2]The Respondent’s application for wasted costs from the Claimant’s representative was agreed by the parties in the sum of £500. EJ - Adkin 21.5.2021 Sent to the parties on: 21/05/21. For the Tribunal Office: Either party may request written reasons for decisions given orally, provided such a request is made within 14 days of the date that this Judgment is sent out. Case Number: 2205774/2020 - 1 - EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS BETWEEN Claimant AND Respondent MR I MOHAMMED RENDALL & RITTNER LIMITED Heard at: London Central, by CVP On: 13, 14, 16, 17 September, 2021 Before: Employment Judge O Segal QC Representations For the Claimant: Ms F Almazedi, solicitor For the Respondent: Ms B Omatosho, solicitor