Miss H Y LiClaimantPrimetime SEO LimitedRespondent
Before
Employment Judge Andrew James DateDate 23 March 2020
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 Employment Rights Act 1996 sections 8, 11, 12, 13, 23 and 24 The Respondent having failed to submit a response to the claim; the claimant having set out clearly in her claim form that she is owed 6 months’ unpaid wages; the respondent having paid wages to the claimant on 6 and 22 November 2019, with deductions having been made without providing the claimant with a statement setting out the amount of the deductions made; a search of Companies House having shown that the Respondent is still active; but the Tribunal not having power to order the provision of payslips or a P60: judgment is ordered as follows:[1]The claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction of wages is well-founded.[2]The respondent has made deductions from the claimant’s gross salary on 6 and 22 November 2019 without providing the claimant with a written statement setting out the amount or purpose of any deductions and therefore her claim under section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is also well-founded.[3]The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of £10,500 less tax and national insurance for 6 months’ unpaid wages (at £1,750 per month).[4]The respondent is to repay to the claimant the difference between the gross pay of £1,750 and the total amount paid to her on 6 and 22 November 2019 (i.e. any deductions for tax, national insurance and/or for any other purposes).[5]The hearing listed for hearing on 24 March 2020 is vacated. 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017 Case No:2205766/2019