Ms E Nedza v Genesis London Solutions Ltd: 2203903/2019
JUDGMENT
The Respondent’s application for reconsideration made by the Respondent’s solicitor’s letter of 7 July 2020 is dismissed.REASONS
[1]I am satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the Respondent is aware of today’s hearing taking place, given the number of communications that have been sent by email and also by post to the Respondent and emails sent by both the Claimant and the Employment Tribunal administration to the solicitor CS Solicitors who made the application for reconsideration.[2]I note that despite the Respondent having instructed solicitors, no application under rule 20 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1 ("the Rules") has been made to extend time for presenting a response, nor has any response been presented to the Tribunal.[3]There is no defence to the Claimant’s claim for unpaid wages which remains unpaid.[4]I therefore confirm the judgment for £4,467.44 made under rule 21 on 1 May 2020. Case No: 2203903/2019 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template[5]It follows that the Claimant may take steps to enforce. Employment Judge Adkin Dated: 1 November 2021 Sent to the parties on: 01/11/2021. For the Tribunal: ………………………….. Claimant: Ms E Nedza Respondent: Genesis London Solutions Limited At: Central London Employment Tribunal Before: Employment Judge Adkin[1]The respondent has failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance in this case.[2]Having considered the ET1, Employment Judge Adkin has decided that a determination of the claim can properly be made without a hearing and the hearing listed for 6 May 2020 will not take place.[3]The Judgment of the Tribunal, made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, is that the respondent unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant.Compensation
[4]The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant £4,467.44.