Mr P Mack v City Financial Investment Company Ltd (in administration): 2202415/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The respondent has failed to file ET3 Grounds of Resistance in this case.[2]Having considered the ET1, EJ Wade has decided that a determination of the claim can properly be made without a hearing.[3]The Judgment of the Tribunal, made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, is that the respondent has unlawfully failed to comply with requirements in both regulations 13 and 14 of the TUPE Regulations 2006 and the tribunal orders the respondent to pay appropriate compensation to the claimant of £30,000.