Ms C Vitug v Amy Lam: 2202203/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The respondent has failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance in this case.[2]Having considered the ET1, EJ Wade has decided that a determination of the claim can properly be made without a hearing and the hearing listed for 29 October will not take place.[3]The Judgment of the Tribunal, made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, is that the respondent unlawfully failed to pay wages and holiday pay to the claimant. Compensation[4]The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant:4.1 Wages of £660 net and4.2 accrued holiday pay of £184.21 net.