J M Suarez v Wilson Associates London Ltd: 2202087/2021

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2202087/2021
Jese Medina SuarezClaimantWilson Associates London Limited At: Central London Employment TribunalRespondent
Employment Judge E BurnsDate 12 January 2022

JUDGMENT

[1]The respondent has failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance in this case.[2]Having considered the ET1, EJ E Burns has decided that a determination of the claim can properly be made without a hearing and the Judgment of the Tribunal, made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, is as set out below.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent until 26 February 2021. He has informed the tribunal that he earned a salary of £15,666.67 per month (gross). This equates to £3,615.39 per week.[4]The claimant has informed the tribunal that the respondent has unlawfully failed to pay him 1 month’s salary (for the month of February 2021) and in lieu of 3 days’ holiday pay.[5]The tribunal orders the respondent to pay to the claimant: 1 month’s salary = £15,666.67 0.6 weeks’ holiday x £3,615.39 = £2169.23 This comes to a total of £17,835.90 gross (subject to deductions for any tax and national insurance due on this amount) 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template Case No: 2202087/2021