F Ahmed v Jewel’s Café Ltd T/a The Colonnade Hotel: 2201594/2024
JUDGMENT
[1]The Respondents have failed to file an ET3 in this case.[2]The correct name of the Respondent is Jewels Café Limited, trading as the Colonnade Hotel.[3]Having considered the ET1 and documents provided by the Claimant, Employment Judge Spencer has decided that a determination of the claim can properly be made without a hearing and the Judgment of the Tribunal, made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, is as set out below.[4]The Respondent has unlawfully failed to pay wages in the gross sum of £4188.17.[5]Accordingly, the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant £4188.17. ___________________ Employment Judge Spencer Date: 22/5/2024 Sent to the parties on: 24 May 2024 ……………………………. Case No: 2201594/24 For the Tribunal: ………………………….. Note The above award is expressed as a gross figure. Provided that the Respondent makes appropriate deduction is respect of income tax and national insurance and accounts therefore to the proper authorities payment of the Claimant of the net sum will represent a valid discharge of this judgment. Case No:2201594/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr F Ahmed Respondent: Jewel’s Café t/a The Colonnade UPON APPLICATION made by letter dated 28 May 2024 on behalf of the Respondent to reconsider the amount of the award made to the Claimant pursuant to a judgment sent to the parties on 24 May 2024, it is appropriate, under rule 71 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, to reconsider the Judgment without a hearing.REASONS
[1]On 24th May 2024 a Judgment under Rule 21 was issued awarding the Claimant £4,188.17 for unpaid wages. This did not take into account sums already paid by the Respondent. The correct amount of unpaid wages is as set out above.[2]The Claimant has agreed the revised sum is the correct sum. _____________________________ Employment Judge F Spencer 4 November 2024[1].The Judgment sent to the parties on 24th May 2024 is varied as follows.[2]Paragraphs 4 and 5 shall be varied by deleting the sum of £4188.17 and inserting the sum of £2,450.17. A revised Judgment is attached.[1]On 24th May 2024 a Judgment under Rule 21 was issued awarding the Claimant £4,188.17 for unpaid wages. This did not take into account sums already paid by the Respondent. The correct amount of unpaid wages is as set out above.[2]The Claimant has agreed the revised sum is the correct sum.