Miss Camila Ocejo v Daniel Jake Evans: 2201027/2020
JUDGMENT
[1]The Respondent has failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance in this case.[2]Having considered the ET1, Employment Judge Adkin has decided that a determination of the claim can properly be made without a hearing.[3]The Judgment of the Tribunal, made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, is that the respondent unlawfully deducted the claimant’s wages pursuant to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and failed to pay holiday pay. Compensation[4]The Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant £4,019.11 (net of deductions for income tax and national insurance).