Mrs N Pratt v Clough North Ltd and Zishan Zaman: 1811405/2018 and 1811406/2018
JUDGMENT
[1]The Claimant was employed by the Second Respondent.[2]All complaints against the First Respondent are hereby dismissed.[3]The Second Respondent has not entered a response (a response received on 11 February 2019 was rejected as it had been submitted late and did not include an application to extend time). The Tribunal therefore proceeded to issue Judgment in respect of the claims brought pursuant to Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.3.1 The Claimant suffered unauthorised deductions from wages and the Second Respondent is ordered to pay to her the gross sum of £400.40.3.2 The Second Respondent failed to pay the Claimant in respect of the amount of holidays accrued but untaken as at the termination of her employment and is ordered to pay to the claimant the gross sum of £598.32.3.3 The Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and the Second Respondent is ordered to pay to her damages in the sum of £2,861.04.3.4 The Claimant was unfairly dismissed and the Second Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant as compensation for unfair dismissal the sum Case No:1811405/18 & 1811406/18 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 March 2017 of £8,628.80 (comprised of a basic award of £4,795.70 and a compensatory award of £3,833.10). The Claimant was not dismissed by reason of redundancy.3.5 The Recoupment Regulations apply to this part of the award and:3.5.1 The grand total is £8,628.803.5.2 The prescribed element is £1,573.523.5.3 The prescribed period is from 11 February to 15 April 20193.5.4 The excess of the grand total over the prescribed element is £7,055.28