Miss E Foster v Klare Ltd and Naeem Anwar: 1811177/2018
JUDGMENT
The response is struck out.REASONS
[1]On 12th April 2019 the Employment Tribunal wrote to the Respondents and Ordered them to show cause why their response to the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Case Management Orders issued in the case.[2]The Respondents have failed to reply to the letter of 12th April 2019.[3]The response from the Respondents is therefore struck out.[4]The case shall proceed to a hearing. A date for hearing will follow. Notice of the hearing shall be served upon the Respondents but they may only participate to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. ____________________________ Employment Judge Brain 16th May 2019 Case Number: 1811177/2018 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss E Foster Respondents: 1. Klare Ltd 2. Naeem Anwar Heard at: Hull On: 28 June 2019 Before: Employment Judge Davies Representation Claimant: Ms N Stewart (solicitor) Respondents: Did not attend[1]The Claimant’s claims against the First Respondent for automatically unfair dismissal contrary to s 99 Employment Rights Act 1996 and wrongful dismissal (notice pay) succeed.[2]The Claimant’s claim against the First and Second Respondents for discrimination because of pregnancy by removal of shifts and dismissal succeed. Remedy for discrimination payable by First and Second Respondents jointly and severally[3]The Respondents shall pay the Claimant:a. Compensation for loss of earnings to the date of the Tribunal hearing: £4308.18;b. Interest on those losses (179 days’ interest at 8%): £169.49;c. Compensation for future loss of earnings: £2730.03;d. Compensation for injury to feelings: £7,000;e. Interest on injury to feelings award (359 days at 8%): £550.79; andf. ACAS uplift of 10% on compensation before interest: £1403.82. Remedy for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal[4]No further award is payable as these losses have been compensated for in the discrimination award and the Claimant was not entitled to a basic award.