Miss J Anderson v Clarriots Homecare Ltd: 1810642/2018
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out on the ground it has not been actively pursued.REASONS
[1]The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 11 December 2018 advising her that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and she therefore required the permission of the Court to pursue her claim. It advised her that if she had not sent a copy of the Court’s order to the Tribunal within six months, she would be asked what she had done to obtain the permission of the Court and if she had not made an application, or if it had been refused, she would be asked to give reasons why the claim should not be struck out as not actively pursued.[2]The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 19 June 2019 to say that she had not advised the Tribunal that permission had been obtained and, therefore, an Employment Judge proposed to strike out the claim as not actively pursued. The letter allowed her 14 days to give reasons why this should not be done, including any information about any application to the Court.[3]The claimant has not replied to the Tribunal’s letter of 19 June 2019. It does not appear she has taken any steps to obtain the permission of the Court to pursue the claim. She is not actively pursuing the claim and it is struck out.