Mr P McHugh v Linburg Touring (Logistics) Ltd: 1810568/2018

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1810568/2018
Mr P McHughClaimantLinburg Touring LtdRespondent
Employment Judge DaviesDate 7 February 2019

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The Respondent’s name is changed to Linburg Touring Ltd. The claim form was served on its registered office using its trading name. I have treated it as delivered to the Respondent under Rule 91.[2]The Respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £420.[3]Compensation for hardship is not payable unless the failure to pay wages caused actual financial loss. Employment Judge Davies _____________________________ Date: 13/12/2018 Case No: 1810568/2018 11.13 Judgment on reconsideration of rule 21 Judgment – no hearing - rule 70 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr E Goldstone Respondent: Linburg Touring (Logistics) Ltd UPON APPLICATION made by letter dated 24 December 2018 to reconsider the judgment under rule 71 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 dated 13 December 2018 and without a hearing,

REASONS

No hearing is required as the Respondent requests this alternative course of action and the Claimant agrees. I am again satisfied that the claim form was served on the registered office of the Respondent, which shares a Director with Linburg Touring Ltd. I have treated it as delivered to the Respondent under Rule 91.