Mrs V Donoghue v MJ Gleeson Developments Ltd: 1810544/2018
JUDGMENT
[1]The Claimant’s claim for a redundancy payment is dismissed upon withdrawal.[2]The Claimant’s claim that she was unfairly dismissed is struck out as she Case No:1810544/2018 6.9 Judgment on Withdrawal – part - rule 52 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs V Donoghue Respondent: Gleeson Developments Ltd[3]The claimant’s remaining claims are unaffected by this Judgment. Employment Judge Brain Dated: 1 February 2019 Case No:1810544/2018 6.2 Strike out Judgment – claim - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs V Donoghue Respondent: Gleeson Developments LtdREASONS
[1]By a letter dated 9th May 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.[3]The hearing fixed for 24th May 2019 will not take place.