Mr M Zak v Estabulo Rodizio Bar & Grill: 1806964/2019
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.REASONS
[1]The claimant complains of unfair dismissal and seeks a statutory redundancy payment.[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years’ service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]Section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years’ service to have any right to a redundancy payment. 3. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore, the claimant is not entitled to bring such complaints.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaints should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaints of unfair dismissal and seeking a redundancy payment are struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Employment Judge Maidment Date: 17 December 2019 Case No: 1806964/2019 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr M Zak Respondent: Estabulo Limited[1]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £616.21.[2]The respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £37.90 in respect of unpaid expenses.