Mr L Pawlak v CorrBoard UK Ltd: 1806859/2018
JUDGMENT
[1]The complaint of unfair dismissal contained within this claim is dismissed because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear it.[2]For the avoidance of doubt, the complaints of race discrimination, wrongful dismissal and possibly victimisation will proceed to be heard on their merits.REASONS
[1]It is common ground that the claimant did not have two complete years’ service with the respondent which is the normal qualifying period in order to have the right not to be unfairly dismissed.[2]It is also common ground that the claimant is not pursuing a type of unfair dismissal complaint where no particular length of service is required.[3]It follows that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal complaint and that is the reason for its dismissal. _____________________________ Employment Judge Little 22nd August 2018 Case No:1806859/2018 6.2 Strike out Judgment – claim - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr L Pawlak Respondent: CorrBoard UK Ltd[1]By a letter dated 16 November 2018 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because The claimant had not complied with the Tribunal’s Orders. It has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.