Mrs J Wade v Doing More Print Ltd and Globewell Partners Ltd: 1806680/2024 and 1806681/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1806680/2024, 1806681/2024
Mrs J WadeClaimant(1) Doing More Print Limited (2) Globewell Partners LtdRespondent
Employment Judge Maidment DateDate 4 December 2024

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The claims were issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 12 May 2024 and 11 June 2024. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[1]Globewell Partners Ltd is removed as a respondent to these proceedings on the claimant’s confirmation that Doing More Print Limited, the first respondent, is the correct name of the claimant’s former employer and is therefore the correct respondent to the claim.[2]The first respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent must pay the claimant the total gross amount of £3926.19.[3]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant the gross amount of £1270.22.[4]The claimant was unfairly dismissed by the first respondent and, as compensation for unfair dismissal, the first respondent is ordered to pay to her a basic award of £14,467.50.