Miss J Fogg v Mr J Oates-Smith: 1806662/2020
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out.REASONS
[1]By an Order sent to the parties on 12 March 2021 the claimant was ordered to set out further information.[2]By a letter sent to the parties on 14 May 2021 the claimant was warned I was considering striking out the claim because: 2.1. the claimant was ordered to provide the details at paragraph 3 a) to g) of the Order sent to the parties on 12 March, by 23 April and she did not do so – it is therefore impossible to see why she says she is still owed holiday pay; 2.2. the claimant does not have two years’ service and has not identified why she has the right to claim unfair dismissal; 2.3. the respondent says the final pay was correct and accepted in full and final settlement. 2.4. The claim form does not include a claim for unpaid wages (week in hand) identified in her email of 7 May 2021.[3]The claimant was also reminded to copy any correspondence to the respondent in accordance with Rule 92.[4]The claimant replied by email on 17 May 2021 without copying the respondent saying she had sent all needed information. The only information sent was wage slips and an email on 7 May saying she had read the response, what was said in the response about pay was wrong (but not how it was wrong), and other complaints which did not provide the information she was asked to provide.[5]The claimant was also invited to say whether she requested a hearing. She has not done so.[6]The claimant has not complied with the March orders and has not complied with Rule 92; nor has she requested a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.