Mr A Jordan v Conzac Solutions Ltd: 1805464/2021
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out.[2]For the avoidance of doubt, the claimant’s remaining complaints shall proceed.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 29 October 2021 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of unfair dismissal should not be struck out because it appeared he had been employed for less than two years by the respondent.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of unfair dismissal is therefore struck out.[3]The claimant’s remaining claims remain listed for hearing on 4 January 2022. Employment Judge Deeley Date: 23 November 2021 Case number: 1805464/2021 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A Jordan Respondent: Conzac Solutions Ltd Heard at: Hull by CVP On: 4 January 2022 Before: Employment Judge Miller Representation Claimant: No attendance Respondent: No attendance[1]The claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 21 October 2021. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The case was listed for a hearing but the claimant did not attend. It is in the interests of justice to continue in the claimant’s absence and a determination can properly be made of the claim in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £3185.89 gross.