Mr J Williams v K&S Auto’s Ltd: 1805321/2021
JUDGMENT
[1]Having considered Rules 2, 30A and 47 of Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, we decided to proceed with the hearing in the absence of the Claimant.[2]The Claimant’s claims for unfair dismissal contrary to section 99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (the “ERA”) are not well-founded and are dismissed. In this regard, the prescribed circumstances were those set out in sections 99(3)(c), (ca) and (d) of the ERA.[3]The Claimant’s claim that the Respondent unreasonably refused to permit him to take time off as required by section 57A of the ERA is not well-founded and is dismissed. Case Number: 1805321/2021[4]The Claimant’s claim that he was subjected to pregnancy discrimination contrary to section 18 of the Equality Act 2010 (the “EA”) is not well founded and is dismissed.[5]The Claimant’s claim that he was subjected to direct sex discrimination contrary to section 13 of the EA is not well-founded and is dismissed.