Miss K Senior v What’s Running Ltd: 1805306/2023
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The name of the Respondent has been amended from Nicholas Chacksfield to What’s Running Limited.[2]The claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 19 October 2023. The Respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[3]The claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and for holiday pay succeed.[4]The compensation to which the Claimant is entitled will be determined at the hearing listed 14 December 2023. Employment Judge Lancaster Date: 13th December 2023 Cases: 1805306/2023 1806505/2023 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss K Senior Respondent: What’s Running Limited AT A REMEDY HEARING Heard at: Leeds by CVP video link On: 14th December 2023 Before: Employment Judge Lancaster Representation Claimant: In person (joining on audio only by telephone) Respondent: No appearance entered and did not attend[1]Further to the liability judgment in claim 1805306/2023 the Respondent is ordered to pay £4,465.69 compensation to the Claimant, calculated as follows: Unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of 3 month’s pay (due for March. April and May 2023) at £1351.35 per month, the gross sum of £4054.05 Accrued holiday pay due at 31st May 2023, the date of termination, 1.32 weeks (151/365 x 5.6 weeks less 1 week [5 days bank holidays taken] ) at £311.85 per week (£1351.35 x 12/52): the gross sum of £411.64[2]Claim number 1806505/2023 is dismissed upon withdrawal, as it is merely a duplicate of claim 1805306/2023