Prof J Linton v University of Sheffield and David Oglethorpe: 1805221/2019
JUDGMENT
The claims of associative direct discrimination and discrimination due to belief are struck out.REASONS
[1]Three deposit orders were made on 27 November 2019 and sent to the Claimant on 04 December 2019. The Claimant was specifically advised of the time to pay each deposit. I explained to the Claimant what would occur if he did not pay one or more of the deposits. The Claimant has paid a deposit in relation to victimisation only. Pursuant to rule 39(4) the subject of the two other deposit orders are struck out for non-compliance Employment Judge T R Smith Date: 25 January 2020[2]Case No 1805221/2019 6.8 Judgment on Withdrawal rule 52 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Prof J Linton Respondent: R1] University Of Sheffield R2] Mr D Oglethorpe[4]The proceedings are dismissed against the 2nd Respondent following a withdrawal by the claimant. Employment Judge JM Wade Date 23 July 2020[5]Case No: 1805221/2019 1801048/2020 6.3 Strike Out Judgment – claim – part - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Prof J Linton Respondent: University of Sheffield[7]The complaints of victimisation and a failure to make reasonable adjustments in case 1801048/2020 are struck out for non-payment of a deposit. The claimant’s claims in case 1805221/2019 remain listed for hearing on 15 to 19 March 2021. Employment Judge Maidment 15 October 2020[8]Case No: 1805221/2019 & 1801048/2020 11.12 Judgment on reconsideration – no hearing - rules 70 and 73 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Prof J Linton Respondent: University Of Sheffield UPON APPLICATION made by letter dated 16 & 17 November 2020 to reconsider the judgment dated 15 October 2020 under rule 71 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and without a hearing,[10]The Judgment issued Striking Out the complaints of victimisation and a failure to make reasonable adjustments in case 1801048/2020 for a non-payment of a deposit is now revoked.