Mr T Mann v Chadwick Construction Ltd: 1805025/2021
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out.REASONS
[1]By Order dated 17 January 2022, sent to the parties on 20 January 2022 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued. In particular:(a) the claimant has not complied with the Tribunal’s Order of 28 September 2021 which required him to explain why his complaint of unfair dismissal should not be struck out by 12 October 2021; and(b) the claimant has failed to attend the preliminary hearing arranged for 2pm on 13 January 2022 and did not provide any reason for his failure to attend the hearing; and(c) the claimant has not complied with the Tribunal’s Order of 17 January 2022, which required him to provide reasons why his claim should not be struck out (and/or request a hearing to provide such reasons) on the basis that the Tribunal did not appear to have jurisdiction to consider the claimant’s claim, due to the issues raised by the respondent in relation to ACAS early claim conciliation.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Deeley Date: 11 February 2022 Case No: 1805025/2021 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr T Mann Respondent: Chadwick Construction Ltd[1]Chadwick Construction Ltd submitted a valid employers contract claim and the claimant was ordered to provide a written response by 18 March 2022.[2]The claimant has failed to provide a written response to the employer’s contract claim.[3]The employer’s contract claim succeeds and the claimant is ordered to pay the net sum of £217.44 to the respondent.