Mr P Leedham v Tripak Ltd: 1804789/2019
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The name of the respondent is amended to Tripak Limited.[2]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2318.05.[3]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £650.00.[4]The hearing listed on 15th November 2019 is cancelled.REASONS
[1]The Claim Form was issued in the name of William Gluck and initially rejected.[2]On 17th September 2019 the claimant applied to amend to claim against Tripak Limited, as identified in the ACAS Early Conciliation certificate.[3]The claim was then accepted, but an administrative error by the tribunal led to the respondent being wrongly cited as William Gluck t/a Tripak Limited.[4]The claim was however served on the respondent company’s registered office address.[5]No response has been received and judgment is now issued for the quantified sums claimed. Employment Judge Lancaster _____________________________ Date: 25th October 2019 Case No:1804789/2019 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017[1]The Respondent’s application for an extension of time to serve the Response and for a reconsideration of the judgment sent out on 28th October 2019 is refused. The Judgement entered under rule 21 is confirmed.[3]The Respondent is further ordered to pay to the Claimant preparation time, summarily assessed at 6 hours, in the sum of £234.00