Mr C Sanderson v Rothgen Timber Engineering Ltd: 1804289/2019

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1804289/2019
Mr C SandersonClaimantRothgen Timber Engineering LtdRespondent
Employment Judge KeevashDate 20 August 2020

JUDGMENT

The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.

REASONS

[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this Judgment. Employment Judge Keevash Date: 6 September 2019 Case No:1804289/2019 6.4 Strike Out Judgment – response - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr C Sanderson Respondent: Rothgen Timber Engineering Ltd[1]By a letter dated 31st March 2020 the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because  the respondent had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 31st March 2020[2]The respondent has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The response is therefore struck out.[3]The respondent will be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal but will only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. Employment Judge Maidment 23rd April 2020 Case No: 1804289/2019 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr C Sanderson Respondent: Rothgen Timber Engineering Limited[1]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3000.[2]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £3000 and an additional sum of £2000 in respect of unpaid expenses.[3]The hearing listed on 7 September 2020 is cancelled.