Mr W L Sze v Pollington Transport Company Ltd: 1804073/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]On my own initiative, the name of the Respondent is substituted for Pollington Transport Company Limited. Although both parties referred to the Respondent as Pollington Transport Co Limited on the ET1 and ET3, and this latter description appears on the Claimant’s contract of employment, this legal entity does not exist at companies house. The correct legal entity, recorded at companies house, is Pollington Transport Company Limited.[2]During the hearing, the Respondent accepted liability for the Claimant’s claim. His claim for unauthorised deductions from wages is therefore well founded and succeeds. During the hearing, the parties agreed to a settlement of this claim in the sum of £1,250. Therefore, the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £1,250. This is a gross sum and the Claimant is required to account for any income tax and/or national insurance contributions which may be due on it. Case Number: 1804073/2023