Mr M Owst and Mrs E Owst v Mr K Dandilly: 1803025/2022 and 1803026/2022
JUDGMENT
[1]The claims were issued in the North Eastern Employment Tribunals on 23 June 2022. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The claim was heard pursuant to rule 21(2) Of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.[2]The first claimant’s claim that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from his wages is successful and the respondent shall pay Mr M Owst the gross sum of £1595.[3]The second claimant’s claim that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from her wages is successful and the respondent shall pay Mrs E Owst the gross sum of £1158. Employment Judge Miller 20 September 2022 Case number: 1803025/2022 1803026/2022 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr M Owst(1) Mrs E Owst(2) Respondent: Mr Kenneth Dandilly Heard at: Hull (remotely by video) On: 20 September 2022 Before: Employment Judge Miller Representation Claimants: In person Respondent: No attendance[1]The claims were issued in the North Eastern Employment Tribunals on 23 June 2022. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The claim was heard pursuant to rule 21(2) Of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.[2]The first claimant’s claim that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from his wages is successful and the respondent shall pay Mr M Owst the gross sum of £1595.[3]The second claimant’s claim that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from her wages is successful and the respondent shall pay Mrs E Owst the gross sum of £1158.