Mr A Telepko v Brazuka Ltd: 1803015/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The respondent is correctly identified above pursuant to Rule 34.[2]The claimant’s complaint of an unlawful deduction from his wages is dismissed, pursuant to Rule 47.REASONS
[1]The claimant presented a deductions from wages complaint on 6 June 2019 and standard case management orders were issued requiring the claimant by 11 July to set out in writing to the respondent the remedy he sought, including any evidence and documentation supporting what was claimed.[2]The respondent and the Tribunal have corresponded with the claimant at the email address given in his claim form for communications. From the file before me and information from Mr Peel, he has not, since presentation of the claim, complied with the order, nor communicated with the Tribunal at all.[3]Today he did not attend. A telephone call was made by the Tribunal to seek any reasons for his failure to attend but the call was received by a voicemail service only.[4]In these circumstances I consider it in the interests of justice to dismiss the claim pursuant to Rule 47: it appears to me from all the information before me that the claimant does not pursue his claim and that, in all likelihood, is the reason for him not attending today.