D Knippenborg v Wayward Son Ltd (Dissolved) and Mr J Wolski: 1802411/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1802411/2022
D KnippenborgClaimant1. Wayward Son Limited (dissolved) 2. Mr John WolskiRespondent
Employment Judge Maidment DateDate 9 September 2022

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 16 May 2022. The respondents have failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The claim against the first respondent is dismissed as it is against a dissolved company.[3]The second respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant the gross sum of £263.06.