Ms M Franklin v Shuropody Retail Ltd: 1802398/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1802398/2022
Ms M FranklinClaimantShuropody Retail LtdRespondent
Employment Judge LancasterIn person for claimantDate 19 July 2022

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 16 May 2022. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[1]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant the gross sum of £1970.96.[2]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant the gross sum of £838.93.[3]The claimant’s claim of unfair dismissal succeeds and is upheld. The Tribunal awards the claimant the sum of £2,025.00 as a basic award (calculated at 4 year’s employment, all over the age of 41, 4 x 1 ½ x a week’s pay @ 337.50). For the avoidance of doubt, the Tribunal has not made a compensatory award as part of this Rule 21 judgement. NOTES[1]If the claimant wishes to seek a compensatory award in respect of her unfair dismissal claim, any such compensation will need to be determined at a hearing of this claim.[2]Public access to Employment Tribunal judgments: Judgments and written reasons for judgments, where they are provided, are published in full online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the parties in the case. Employment Judge Lancaster Date: 19th July 2022 Case: 1802398/2022 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs M Franklin Respondent: Shuropody Retail Limited AT A REMEDY HEARING Heard at: Leeds On: 9th November 2022 Before: Employment Judge Lancaster Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: No appearance entered, but represented by Ms H Wild, consultant, participating to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge