Mr C Reid v Enviroheat Yorkshire Ltd (in administration) and Mechanical Modular Systems Ltd (in voluntary liquidation): 1802383/2018
JUDGMENT
[1]Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013:a. The claim of unauthorised deduction from wages against the First Respondent is well-founded and succeeds. The First Respondent shall pay the Claimant £70 net.b. It is declared that the Claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment from the First Respondent in the sum of £1200 (3 x 1 x £400 gross weekly pay).c. The claim of breach of contract in respect of notice pay against the First Respondent is well-founded and succeeds. The First Respondent shall pay the Claimant £1523.70 net (contractual entitlement 4 weeks x net weekly pay £380.92).d. The claim of unfair dismissal against the First Respondent is well-founded and succeeds. The First Respondent shall pay the Claimant a compensatory award of £761.84 (one week’s net loss of wages + compensation for loss of statutory rights in the sum of one week’s pay).[2]The Claimant’s claims against the Second Respondent are stayed. _______________________ Employment Judge Davies 19 October 2018 Sent to the parties on: ……………………………. For the Tribunal: ……………………………. Case No: 1802383/2018 6.2 Strike out Judgment – claim - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr C Reid Respondent: Enviroheat Yorkshire Limited & OthersREASONS
[1]By a letter dated 19 February 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. _____________________________ Employment Judge Bright 14.03.19[1]By a letter dated 5 July 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.