Miss M Collinson and others v Inspire 2 Independence (i2i) Ltd (in administration): 1802174/2019 and others
JUDGMENT
[1]Any remaining money claims concerning outstanding pay or expenses are dismissed: these claims have been resolved or are no longer pursued.[2]The 1992 Act protective award claims for a failure to consult are dismissed (twenty six claimants in the attached schedule): the respondent did not propose to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less taking into account the various centres and areas of work.[3]The respondent’s responses to the claims of Mrs Fletcher, Mrs Cross, Mrs Taylor Mr Hicks and Ms Barker (“the TUPE claims”) are struck out, the respondent having been ordered to show cause by 7 October 2019 why those responses should not be struck out and having failed to do so.[4]The TUPE Regulation 15 (1) complaint is well founded. Miss M Collinson & 30 others -v- Inspire 2 Independence (i2i) Ltd 1802174/2019 Miss M Collinson 1802221/2019 Mrs T Davis 1802222/2019 Miss M Duke 1802227/2019 Mrs R Garvie 1802230/2019 Mrs C Haigh 1802231/2019 Mr M Hardy 1802241/2019 Mrs R Lowbridge 1802266/2019 Ms T Young 1802387/2019 Mr J Finn 1802408/2019 Mrs E Kama 1802409/2019 Mrs N Keating 1802410/2019 Miss E King 1802412/2019 Miss H Kunkel 1802413/2019 Mrs M Maguire 1802415/2019 Miss J Moran 1802422/2019 Mr J Sidaway 1802424/2019 Mrs C Wallis 1802442/2019 Miss E Taylor 1802768/2019 Miss M Mills 1802776/2019 Mrs H Williams 1802979/2019 Mrs S Steele 1802989/2019 Mrs V Cross 1802995/2019 Miss R Inman 1803005/2019 Mr J Mann 1803021/2019 Mrs K Fletcher 1803296/2019 Mr G Hicks 1803463/209 Miss AJ Barker 1303497/2019 Miss D Clayton 1303657/2019 Mrs K Hill 1804761/2019 Mr M Wynn 2601598/2019 Mrs L Ellerby