Mrs A McNamara v Amvale Medical Transport Ltd: 1801825/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant’s allegations that:(a) The claimant was subject to sexual harassment when Malcolm Pearson commented that the claimant had a new neighbour (his niece); and(b) The claimant was subject to sexual harassment when control was rude to her when she enquired by telephone about shifts and work breaks are struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the claimant failing to pay within the time specified the deposits ordered by the Tribunal on 13 June 2019.[2]The claimant’s other allegations and complaints in this case are unaffected by this judgment. _____________________________ Regional Employment Judge Robertson Date 11 July 2019[1]The Respondent did not discriminate against the Claimant because of sex. The Respondent did not harass the Claimant.[3]The Respondent did not victimise the Claimant.