Mr F Djedje v Cordant Security Ltd: 1801795/2020

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1801795/2020
In PersonClaimantNo attendanceRespondent
Employment Judge WedderspoonIn person for claimantNot represented for respondentMr. Brill (instructed by Solicitor) for respondentDate 1 March 2022

JUDGMENT

[1]The Claimant’s claim of direct race discrimination dismissal contrary to section 13 and 39 (2)(c) of the Equality Act 2010 is well founded and succeeds.[2]By 22 September 2020 the claimant will send to the Employment Tribunal a document (called a schedule of loss) setting out the amount of injury to feelings he seeks and the wages he received from the Respondent per month net of tax and any benefits he has received since his dismissal. Further, the claimant will state when he is likely to obtain alternative employment.[3]The Tribunal will assess the losses on the basis of his schedule of loss and representations from the Respondent (if any are made). Employment Judge Wedderspoon 25 September 2020 Case Number: 1801795/2020 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr. Djedge v Cordant Security Limited(1) Security Realisations Limited in Administration(2) Heard by CVP On: 17 February & 29 March 2021 Before: Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation: Claimant: In Person Respondents: Mr. Brill, Solicitor RECONSIDERATION JUDGMENT[1]The Judgment dated 15 September 2020 and issued on 25 September 2020 is hereby revoked.[2]The respondent Cordant Security Limited is removed from the proceedings.[3]The name of the respondent to the claim is replaced by Security Realisations Limited in administration. Employment Judge Wedderspoon Date: 6th April 2021 Case Number: 1801795/2020 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr F I Djedje Respondent: Security Realisations Limited in Administration

REASONS

[1]By a letter dated 31 January 2022 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.