Ms S Colman and others v Bonmarche Ltd (in administration) and others: 1801296/2020 and others
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1801296/2020, 1801461/2020
Between
Ms S Colman and othersClaimantBonmarche Ltd (in administration) and othersRespondent
Before
Employment Judge MaidmentIn person for claimant(2) & (4) Mr C Thompson (instructed by Solicitor) for respondentDate 4 February 2021
JUDGMENT
The Claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal is dismissed upon her withdrawal of it. Employment Judge Maidment Date 27 July 2020 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON Date: 29 July 2020 Case Nos: 1801296/20, 1801297/20, 1801298/20,1801299/20, 1801461/20 & 1801541/20 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimants: Ms G Higgins Ms C Johnson Ms A McMillan Ms J Stevens Ms S Colman Mrs J Smith Respondent:(1) Bonmarche Limited (in administration)(2) Peacocks Stores Limited (in administration)(3) The Secretary of State for BEIS(4) BM Retail Limited (in administration) JUDGMENT Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The Tribunal declares that the first respondent has failed to comply with the requirements of Section 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and makes a protective award that the first respondent shall pay remuneration to the claimants dismissed as redundant on 29 October 2019 for a period of 90 days beginning on 29 October 2019.[2]The remaining complaints of the claimants are dismissed upon their withdrawal of them.