Miss E Coates and others v Lou’s Clearance Outlet Ltd: 1801223/2022 and others
JUDGMENT
[1]Lou’s Clearance Outlet Ltd is substituted as the correct Respondent to these claims.[2]I am satisfied that all the claims have come to the attention of the Respondent. They have been served on Lou’s Clearance or Lou’s Clearance Outlet at its registered office.[3]No ET3 responses have been served. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, on the available material a determination can properly be made of the claims and I issue the following judgments accordingly.[4]The First Claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages (holiday pay) is well-founded and succeeds (1801223/2022). The Respondent shall pay the First Claimant £359.48. The First Claimant will be responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance.[5]The Second Claimant’s complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages of £222.75 (1801619/2022) and for payment of £356.40 in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday (1802062/2022) are well-founded and succeed. The Respondent shall pay the Second Claimant the total sum of £579.15. The Second Claimant will be responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance.[6]The Third Claimant’s complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages of £705.75 (1801620/2022) and for payment of £319.94 in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday (1802063/2022) are well-founded and succeed. The Respondent shall pay the Third Claimant the total sum of £1025.69. The Third Claimant will be responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance.