Mr M Boughton v DM Print Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) and Doing More Print Ltd: 1801146/2024 and Others

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1801146/2024, 1800502/2024, 1804287/2024
Mr M BoughtonClaimant(1) DM Print Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) (2) Doing More Print LtdRespondent
Employment Judge BrightDate 18 December 2024

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The claims were issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 18 January 2024, 17 February 2024 and 02 June 2024. The respondents have failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[1]The 2nd respondent Doing More Print Ltd has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant the gross amount of £821.16.[2]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment. The 2nd respondent Doing More Print Ltd must pay the claimant the gross amount of £17,850.[3]The 2nd respondent Doing More Print Ltd has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant the gross amount of £3796.19.[1]The claims were issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 18 January 2024, 17 February 2024 and 02 June 2024. The respondents have failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondents failed to inform and consult the claimant as required under regulation 13 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 and are ordered to pay the claimant 13 weeks’ pay.[3]The respondents are jointly and severally liable for the award in accordance with regulation 15(9).