Mr G White v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration): 1800812/2019
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim for a protective award succeeds.[2]The Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 10th December 2018.[3]The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefit) Regulations 1996 regulations 6, 7 and 8 apply to this award. The Respondent is accordingly advised of its duties under the Regulations and any award made will be postponed pending any service of a recoupment notice by the Secretary of State in respect of relevant benefits received by the Claimant in the prescribed period and only the balance of any remuneration due will then be payable directly to the Claimant. Employment Judge Lancaster Date: 8th August 2019 Case No: 1800812/2019 6.3 Strike Out Judgment – claim – part - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr G White Respondent: Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration)REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 17 October 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaints of a claim for a redundancy payment, breach of contact (notice pay), holiday pay and unauthorised deductions from wages should not be struck out because: The claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 17 October 2019. It has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaints of a claim for a redundancy payment, breach of contact (notice pay), holiday pay and unauthorised deductions from wages are therefore struck out. The judgment making a protective award still stands