Mr I Hunt v The Secretary of State for Justice: 1800176/2020
JUDGMENT
[1]The claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments detailed at paragraphs 48.1 to 48.3,49.1 to49.2 and50.1 to50.2 are dismissed upon withdrawal. Employment Judge Rostant Date: 22 April 2020[2]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON Date: 22 April 2020[3]Case No: 1800176/2020 6.3 Strike Out Judgment – claim – part - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr I Hunt Respondent: The Secretary Of State For Justice[5]Any claim being pursued by the claimant which relies upon the respondent applying an alleged provision, practice or criterion of not following its own procedures timeously and fully, is struck out.REASONS
[1]On 22 April 2020, the claimant was required to show cause why an aspect of his claim, relying upon the alleged PCP set out above, should not be struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not respond by the 22 May, the date given in the Order. Accordingly, that aspect of the claimant’s claim is struck out. The claimant’s remaining claims remains listed for hearing on 27-30 July 2020. _____________________________ Employment Judge Rostant Dated 27 May 2020[2]Case No: 1800176/2020 11.12 Judgment on reconsideration – no hearing - rules 70 and 73 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr I Hunt Respondent: The Secretary Of State For Justice UPON APPLICATION made by letter dated 27 May 2020 to reconsider the judgment dated 27 May 2020 under rule 71 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and without a hearing,[4]My judgment striking out part of the claimant’s claim is hereby reconsidered and revoked. REASONS[5]The decision to strike this aspect of the claim out was made in ignorance of the existence of the email from the claimant dated 21 May which as a result of administrative error was not linked with the file. The claim as pleaded, and in reliance on an alleged practice of the respondent not following its own policy, is restored. My judgment is not to be taken as any comment on whether that claim is advanced on an arguable basis. _____________________________ Employment Judge Rostant 27 May 2020[6]Case No:1800176/2020 6.8 Judgment on Withdrawal rule 52 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr I Hunt Respondent: The Secretary of State For Justice[8]The proceedings are dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.