Mr R Leeding v Proserve Logistics Ltd: 1603212/2025
JUDGMENT
[1]The claim of dismissal or detriment due to the making of a protected disclosure having been withdrawn by the Claimant is dismissed. The claim of unfair dismissal is struck out as the claimant’s does not have sufficient continuity of service. The remaining claims of direct age discrimination, direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability continues to a final hearing. Approved by Employment Judge S Moore Dated: 11 November 2025 ORDER SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 04 December 2025 Katie Dickson FOR THE SECRETARY TO EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS[2]Case Number: 1603212/2025 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr R Leeding Respondent: Proserve Logistics Limited Heard at: Cardiff (via video) On: 05 March 2026 Before: Employment Judge R Russell Representation Claimant: Mr S Sprysak, lay representative Respondent: Mr D Bunting, Counsel[4]At the relevant times the Claimant was a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of depression. Approved by: