Miss R Howell v SSCL Vetting and HMP Nottingham: 1601130/2024 Miss R Howell v SSCL Vetting and HMP Nottingham: 1601130/2024
JUDGMENT
The complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 19 June 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of unfair dismissal should not be struck out because it. The claimant complains of unfair dismissal.[3]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[4]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[5]Therefore, the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[6]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[7]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment.[1]By a letter dated 10 July 2024 the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because• it has no reasonable prospect of success.• the claimant had not complied with Case Management Orders.[2]The Claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.