Mr S White v Aquarius Direct Maintenance (In Compulsory Liquidation): 1600530/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 In the absence of an ET3 response, and there being sufficient material before me to enable a proper determination to be made, I uphold the following claims:• Unpaid Wages (gross): £2,816.00• Holiday Pay (net): £192.00• Breach of Contract (expenses): £147.50 The claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. I act in accordance with my powers under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure 2013. Employment Judge Brace _____________________________ Date: 23 July 2019[2]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON ………………………………………………… AND ENTERED IN THE REGISTER ……28 July 2019…………………… FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE[3]Case No: 1600530/2019 6.8 Judgment on Withdrawal rule 52 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr S White Respondents: Aquarius Direct Maintenance (In Compulsory Liquidation)[5]The proceedings against Aquarius Direct Maintenance (in compulsory liquidation) are struck out on the grounds they have not been actively pursued.