Ms E Evans and others v Happy Dining Ltd T/a Fed: 1600228/2018 and others
JUDGMENT
[1]Ms E Evans’ claim of unfair dismissal is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,138.98 for the basic award and £1,077.52 for the compensatory award;[2]Ms E Evans’ claim for notice pay is well founded but no compensation will be paid due to the successful unfair dismissal claim;[3]Ms E Evans’ claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,124.00;[4]Ms E Evans’ claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £13.39;[5]Mr Dwivedi’s claim of unfair dismissal is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,045.38 for the basic award and £1,555.82 for the compensatory award;[6]Mr Dwivedi’s claim for notice pay is well founded but no compensation will be paid due to the successful unfair dismissal claim;[7]Mr Dwivedi’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,045.38;[8]Mr Dwivedi’s for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £13.32;[9]Miss Cummins’ claim of unfair dismissal is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £389.07 for the basic award and £765.17 for the compensatory award;[10]Miss Cummins’ claim for notice pay is well founded but no compensation will be paid due to the successful unfair dismissal claim;[11]Miss Cummins’ claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £427.50;[12]Miss Cummins’ claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £4.58;[13]Mr A Singh’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient[14]Mr A Singh’s claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £500;[15]Mr A Singh’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,500.00;[16]Mr A Singh’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £17.64;[17]Miss Iacoviello’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient[18]Miss Iacoviello’s claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £259.77;[19]Miss Iacoviello’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £851.25;[20]Miss Iacoviello’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £9.16;[21]Mr Codes Castro’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient[22]Mr Codes Castro’s claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £260.00;[23]Mr Codes Castro’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £705.00;[24]Mr Codes Castro’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £9.17;[25]Miss AR Militello’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient[26]Miss AR Militello’s claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £235.31;[27]Miss AR Militello’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £592.50;[28]Miss AR Militello’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £8.30;[29]Mr RB Militello’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to lack of evidence about service;[30]Mr RB Militello’s claim for notice pay is dismissed due to lack of evidence about service;[31]Mr RB Militello’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,149,15;[32]Mr RB Militello’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £10.09;[33]Mr Garcia’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient service;[34]Mr Garcia’s claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £285.00;[35]Mr Garcia’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £862.50;[36]Mr Garcia’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £10.05;[37]Miss Gakunga’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient[38]Miss Gakunga’s claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £75.60;[39]Miss Gakunga’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £212.80;[40]Miss Gakunga’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £4.45;[41]Miss Bowes’ claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient[42]Miss Bowes’ claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £163.21;[43]Miss Bowes’ claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £266.25;[44]Miss Bowes’ claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £5.75;[45]Miss Brezinova’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient[46]Miss Brezinova’s claim for notice pay is dismissed due to lack of evidence about service;[47]Miss Brezinova’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £213.75;[48]Miss Brezinova’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is dismissed due to lack of evidence;[49]Mr Somosandaram’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient service;[50]Mr Somosandaram’s claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £431.50;[51]Mr Somosandaram’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,294.50;[52]Mr Somosandaram’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £15.22;[53]Mr Sapkota’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient[54]Mr Sapkota’s claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £400.50;[55]Mr Sapkota’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,201.50;[56]Mr Sapkota’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £14.13;[57]Mrs Sapkota-Pandey’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient service;[58]Mrs Sapkota-Pandey’s claim claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £281.25;[59]Mrs Sapkota-Pandey’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,125.00;[60]Mrs Sapkota-Pandey’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £9.92;[61]Mrs Gurung’s claims of unfair dismissal, notice pay, unpaid wages and unpaid accrued holiday pay are dismissed due to insufficient evidence;[62]Mr J Singh’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient[63]Mr J Singh’s claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £350.00;[64]Mr J Singh’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,050.00;[65]Mr J Singh’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £12.35;[66]Mr Stefanov’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient[67]Mr Stefanov’s claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £262.50;[68]Mr Stefanov’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,125.00;[69]Mr Stefanov’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £9.26;[70]Mr Petrov’s claims of unfair dismissal, notice pay, unpaid wages and unpaid accrued holiday pay are dismissed due to insufficient evidence;[71]Mr Teixiera’s claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed due to insufficient[72]Mr Teixiera’s claim for notice pay is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £375.00;[73]Mr Teixiera’s claim for unpaid wages is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £1,125.00;[74]Mr Teixera’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay £13.23;[75]Mr Krithi’s claims of unfair dismissal, notice pay, unpaid wages and unpaid accrued holiday pay are dismissed due to insufficient evidence;[76]Mr Ismail’s claims of unfair dismissal, notice pay, unpaid wages and unpaid accrued holiday pay are dismissed due to insufficient evidence;[77]Mr Nath’s claims of unfair dismissal, notice pay, unpaid wages and unpaid accrued holiday pay are dismissed due to insufficient evidence;[78]Mr Baltac’s claims of unfair dismissal, notice pay, unpaid wages and unpaid accrued holiday pay are dismissed due to insufficient evidence.[79]The recoupment provisions apply to the unfair dismissal claims brought by Ms E Evans, Mr Dwivedi, and Miss Cummins.