Mr C Smart and others v Loomis UK Ltd: 1600142/2021 and others
JUDGMENT
[1]The complaints of failure to consult collectively and for redundancy payments are dismissed following withdrawals by the Claimants. The Claimants’ remaining claims will proceed. _____________________________ Employment Judge S Jenkins Date: 2 September 2021[2]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 15 September 2021 ........................................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Mr N Roche Case No: 1600142/2021 & others (see Annex) ANNEX SCHEDULE OF CLAIMS 1600142/2021 – Mr C Smart 1600613/2021 – Ms M Thomas 1600615/2021 - Mr P Catley 1600616/2021 – Mr R Danvers 1600617/2021 – Mr J Handy 1600618/2021 – Mr C Flage 1600619/2021 – Mr H Davies 1600620/2021 – Mr J Hill 1600621/2021 – Mr D Maitland 1600622/2021 – Mr I Turner[3]Case Numbers: 1600142/2021 1600613/2021 1600615/2021 1600616/2021 1600617/2021 1600918/2021 1600619/2021 1600620/2021 1600621/2021 1600622/2021 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimants: Mr C Smart Ms M Thomas Mr P Catley Mr R Danvers Mr J Handy Mr C Flage Mr H Davies Mr J Hill Mr D Maitland Mr I Turner Respondent: Loomis UK Limited[5]Rule 52 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 The claims, having been withdrawn by the claimants, are dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. ____________________________ Legal Officer _____7 April 2022_____________ Date of Judgment[6]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 10 May 2022 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Mr N Roche Under regulation 10A(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, because this decision has been made by a Legal Officer, a party may apply in writing to the Tribunal for the decision to be considered afresh by an