Mrs G Doyle v Customate (Southern) Ltd: 1405537/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The hearing was conducted by the parties attending by telephone. It was held in public in accordance with the Employment Tribunal Rules. It was conducted in that manner because a face to face hearing was not possible in light of the restrictions imposed by the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2020.[2]The Claimant was made redundant by the respondent on 19 September 2019.[3]The following claims succeed i. A redundancy payment of £1443.75 ii. 5 weeks’ notice pay of £1443.75 iii. Two weeks holiday pay £577.50[4]In addition, the claimant is awarded 3 weeks’ pay under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for a failure to provide a statement of employment particulars of £866.25.[5]The respondent shall therefore pay the claimant the total sum of £ 4331.25 comprising the following sums: Redundancy pay 5 weeks x £288.75 £1443.75 (gross weekly pay) 5 weeks notice pay £1443.75 2 weeks holiday pay £577.50 Case Number: 1405537/2019 (A) 3 weeks pay as £866.25 compensation under section 38 EA 2002 Total now payable to £4331.25 claimant …………………………………. Employment Judge Rayner Dated: 12 June 2020 Note: online publication of judgments and reasons The ET is required to maintain a register of all judgments and written reasons. The register must be accessible to the public. It has recently been moved online. All judgments and reasons since February 2017 are now available at: https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. The ET has no power to refuse to place a judgment or reasons on the online register, or to remove a judgment or reasons from the register once they have been placed there. If you consider that these documents should be anonymised in any way prior to publication, you will need to apply to the ET for an order to that effect under Rule 50 of the ET's Rules of Procedure. Such an application would need to be copied to all other parties for comment and it would be carefully scrutinised by a judge (where appropriate, with panel members) before deciding whether (and to what extent) anonymity should be granted to a party or a witness