Ms L Hayhurst v Hi9 Ltd and Mr W King: 1405086/2023

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1405086/2023
Ms L HayhurstClaimantHi9 LimitedRespondent
Employment Judge RoperMr Deane (instructed by counsel) for claimantNot represented for respondentDate 1 August 2025

JUDGMENT

The response is struck out.

REASONS

[1]By a letter dated 20th January 2025 the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because  the respondent had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 18th December 2025.  it has not been actively pursued.[2]The respondent has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The response is therefore struck out.[3]The respondent will be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal but will only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. Approved by: Employment Judge Roper 4 February 2025